Monday, October 15, 2018
As the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Congress press for removing safety regulations in order to fast-track the introduction of highly automated vehicles, human factors/ergonomics experts recommend requiring important testing and driver support. A newly released statement from the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) shows how to make autonomous vehicles safer.
Extensive research shows that people often perform more poorly when using automated systems. People are not good at monitoring automation, which leads to increases in distracted driving. Instead of making drivers safer, autonomous vehicles can actually decrease safety by lowering drivers’ understanding of what is happening, even when they are paying attention. As a result, drivers are unable to take control when the car can’t handle the situation.
For example, the National Transportation Safety Board found that the cause of the fatal Tesla crash in Florida in 2016 was overreliance on automation, lack of engagement by the driver, and inattention to the roadway. A Tesla also crashed into a road barrier in California while on autopilot, killing its driver. And Uber experienced a fatal accident in 2017 when one of its vehicles hit a pedestrian in Arizona. These are not isolated incidents but, rather, symptoms of a serious flaw in the design of autonomy software, which ignores how people’s performance is affected by technology.
The HFES policy statement contains 12 recommendations in four categories to guide regulators when considering the introduction of autonomous vehicles:
Automated vehicles require careful testing before deployment on public roads.
Automated vehicles should support the needs of human drivers and other users.
Automated vehicles should be safe and understandable.
Automated vehicles should be accompanied by detailed training for drivers.
Testing should ensure that new technology results in safer driving across a wide range of driving conditions. If the software is not fully reliable and the human driver has to step in, new safety regulations are needed to provide understandable displays that keep the driver aware of what is happening and ensure that they can rapidly take control.
Detailed training by manufacturers will be needed, according to the HFES statement, to help people better understand how the automaton functions and what are its limitations. And this training will need to be ongoing as software updates over time are made to autonomous vehicles while they sit in drivers’ garages.
Before Congress passes pending legislation that will remove important safety regulations and allow companies to sell hundreds of thousands of autonomous cars, HFES urges lawmakers to include these critical requirements to protect the safety of drivers, passengers, and pedestrians across America.
The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society is the world’s largest scientific association for human factors/ergonomics professionals, with more than 4,500 members globally. HFES members include psychologists and other scientists, designers, and engineers, all of whom have a common interest in designing systems and equipment to be safe and effective for the people who operate and maintain them. “Human Factors and Ergonomics: People-Friendly Design Through Science and Engineering.”